拆封收購calling again, my calls were then automatically rejected without explanation. Had I triggered some automated spam blocker? I only had to call repeatedly because I kept getting cut off.Microsoft 365 is one of the firm’s biggest tools, but a question mark hangs over security in recent years. (Image credit: Jennifer Young – Windows Central)In the end, I did get through to someone who did take it upon themselves to contact me via email to maintain contact, who then escalated the case to figure out if I really was the account holder, so that the authenticator could be removed. I realize this is just one account, but you don’t need to go far into Reddit to find mountains of similar experiences. I was grateful to get my issues fixed finally, but I also couldn’t help but consider how easy it was for me to get the authenticator layer removed in the first place. I imagine it would be quite easy for a determined attacker to trick an external call center into removing this security layer, and the lack of cloud backups for the Microsoft Authenticator here seems like an easy vulnerability to fix. Microsoft’s passwordless authenticator layer is also easy to exploit for an attacker potentially, since it throws up three numbers to the Authentication device. All it would take is for someone to get confused and click the wrong number to allow an attacker to enter your account if all they needed to know was your email address.When I first started within the Microsoft ecosystem, getting customer support for practically any product was incredibly easy. I did so multiple times for Surface devices, Xbox, and Office 365. These days, you’re ferried around a Kafkaesque maze of bots and outsourced call centers, the latter of which doesn’t seem fit for purpose. Microsoft has vaguely made its senior-level pay incentives directly tied to “security milestones” as part of initiatives launched last year, but the details remain scant. I’m sure it’s more profitable to hope you don’t get hacked so you can save money that would otherwise be invested in security, but the long-term damage of this attitude is readily apparent. Microsoft itself warned investors of “cyberattacks and security vulnerabilities that could lead to reduced revenue, increased costs, liability claims, or harm to our reputation or competitive position” in their most recent quarterly earnings. Indeed. Surface and Windows Phone almost made Microsoft seem cool, until again, Microsoft gave upSatya Nadella shares a walk with former Nokia CEO Stephen Elop. (Image credit: Microsoft)Last year, Satya Nadella lamented killing Windows Phone, calling it a mistake. Indeed, Microsoft acquired Nokia’s phone division for over $7 billion, and then Satya Nadella wrote it off and shut down the entire project not long after becoming CEO. It was also not long after Satya Nadella posted a photo op between himself and then Nokia CEO Stephen Elop while claiming to be fully committed to the platform. Why did Satya Nadella call running Windows Phone into the ground a mistake? Well, as I mentioned in the intro, they’ve now handed all the keys to mobile computing to Apple and Google, who will stop at nothing to hinder Microsoft’s efforts in search, social media, gaming, and consumer-oriented A.I. products. Defining features of A.I. capabilities for computing paradigms will leave Microsoft behind as Apple, Google, and Samsung roll out their efforts to consumers first and define an industry. At the same time, Microsoft has to watch from the sidelines. It needn’t have been this way. Increasingly, companies are trying to figure out how to “mobilize” A.I. tools. We’ve seen some less-than-impressive products, like the rabbit r1 pocket device that comes with ChatGPT and little else. But I feel like there’s something to be said about a device that doesn’t absorb all of your time and can be more of a healthy companion than today’s distraction-prone blackhole devices. Either way, someone smarter than me probably could’ve worked all this out, but Microsoft has lost some of its biggest hardware innovators in recent years. As far as I can tell, the fantastic commercial for the Surface Studio has been removed entirely from Microsoft’s YouTube, which gives you an idea of how Microsoft today feels about its hardware and the communities it curates around it. Panos Panay, Alex Kipman, and others known for leading innovation in Microsoft hardware are no longer at the company for various reasons. Panos Panay most notably architected the entire Surface line, whereas Kipman was responsible for creating Kinect and HoloLens. Beyond Windows Phone itself, precluding Microsoft’s efforts in mobile computing, Microsoft has also wound down its efforts to innovate in desktop computers, laptops, and tablets. The next Surface event is touted to be something of a muted affair. Microsoft is doing some exciting things with ARM processors in Surface, but the overall design of the Surface line has barely shifted in recent times. Some more innovative and spectacular designs have been wholly shelved, like the Surface Duo, Neo, Studio, and Book, in favor of more traditional form factors like the Surface Pro and Laptop. It’s an entirely separate article about the decline of Surface in recent years. Still, if I’d seen Microsoft’s lack of investment and faith in growing and improving Surface, I’d have probably jumped ship like Panos did, too. For customers, it means the future of Surface looks similarly bleak. The Surface Duo was a frustrating product in some ways, but it’s hardly shocking that Microsoft wouldn’t nail an Android phone in the first couple of iterations. Samsung has struggled to make a genuinely high-quality version of Android for many years and has only recently come into its own here. Microsoft’s Surface Laptop Studio was an excellent replacement for the Book, save for a few downsides like lacking I/O, and the desktop Studio was just too expensive for the power it was packing. You’d have thought both were relatively easy fixes, but typical Microsoft threw in the towel. While I am excited about the Snapdragon X Elite Surface iterations, as a consumer, my faith in Surface’s future couldn’t be lower. Surface suffers the same customer support cut-corners as Microsoft 365, with retail stores shut down and marketing spend nearly nonexistent. Microsoft’s fickle attitude to its products doesn’t inspire the kind of consumer confidence competitors like Apple or Dell enjoy and need through its short-sighted designs. Winning trust in the consumer space is incredibly difficult. In previous years, Microsoft had invested a lot of time and effort in curating the goodwill and prestige around the Surface brand. Still, now it’s throwing it all away with inconsistency and a downgraded presence atop a lack of innovation. The death of Surface won’t just be the death of Surface; it’ll be the death of trust should Microsoft ever attempt anything like this again, as an extension of the trust damage already playing out from the death of Windows Phone. Ads in the Windows 11 Start Menu is pure insanity(Image credit: Future)It’s perhaps a small irony that Microsoft is fighting with regulators about Google and Apple’s control over mobile, while it abuses its position on Windows 11 to bully everyone into using its products on PC. Microsoft could have had control over its mobile future, without having to beg regulators and Apple and Google to open up their platforms, had it stuck it out with Windows Phone. However, Microsoft ultimately made its bed. Microsoft is applying a double standard and hypocrisy into Windows 11 itself, which is struggling to claim market share from the near decade-old Windows 10 by some metrics. Users have been complaining about “ads” in Windows for years. Whether it’s pre-installed software that you won’t have any intention of using, or “recommendations” in the lock screen. Generally, you can uninstall or turn most Windows 11 ads off, but Microsoft has been getting more aggressive in recent years. An example of a Start Menu app “recommendation” ad. (Image credit: Microsoft)Microsoft will start placing recommended apps in the Start Menu, as depicted above. It’ll roll out gradually in the coming weeks, and it seems some of these will be quite easily turned off. However, Microsoft has also gotten incredibly aggressive with marketing Microsoft Edge within Windows 11 recently, moving beyond simple “hey, Microsoft Edge is actually pretty good” to outright resetting your default browser when you run major updates. Microsoft will drop pop-ups to warn you not to install Chrome and beg you to stay with Microsoft Edge when searching for Chrome within Bing. I actually use Microsoft Edge, and I like it a lot. The password manager is incredibly easy to use and syncs between Edge on my desktop and Samsung Galaxy well. But punishing users who don’t want to use it is egregious and a problem of Microsoft’s own making. Google made a browser that was simply better through innovation and hard work. Microsoft didn’t invest enough in its browser technology, and excluded themselves from the market by putting customers last — notice a pattern here?Corporate is coming for Xbox, with short-sighted ‘money-now’ strategies that will cause irreparable damageXbox Series X and Series S. (Image credit: Windows Central | Jez Corden)I love my Xbox Series X; it’s an incredible piece of kit that does exactly what I want it to, but similarly to Microsoft Edge, it might be too late. Xbox hardware sales have been down around 30% year over year, two years in a row. Part of that is a poor game line-up and inconsistent delivery from Xbox. Part of it is the general gaming downturn. Another part of it is Microsoft’s catastrophic 2013 reveal of the Xbox One, which has cast a cloud of doubt over the brand ever since. Despite all this, Xbox has record revenue, even before Activision-Blizzard joined the fray. Indeed, Microsoft wants to stay in gaming, hence spending $72 billion on Activision-Blizzard last year, giving it control over Call of Duty, World of Warcraft, and other major PC, console, and mobile franchises. I still had this potentially naïve outlook that Activision under Xbox would benefit all involved. Still, it resulted immediately in hundreds of layoffs, game cancellations squeezed budgets, and studio closures and divestitures. From the outside, it’s hard not to see what’s going on at Xbox as totally chaotic, and as with the above, chaos and inconsistency have typified Microsoft’s playbook in the years I’ve been covering the brand. Most of Xbox’s life span over the past ten years has revolved around playing catch up, and the fact they’re still in the game is a miracle. Innovations like Xbox Game Pass, advocation from Phil Spencer and his team, and building more affordable consoles like the Xbox Series S have helped Microsoft stay in the running. But now, Microsoft’s corporatism is infecting the good will and momentum Xbox had been generating in recent years, threatening to derail the hard work to rebuild. (Image credit: Windows Central)Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella previously said that he “has no love” for the world of console-exclusive games. Fast-forward a few months, and Nadella is now celebrating with investors his strategy to move Xbox’s exclusive games to PlayStation, a strategy that has been met with widespread alarm from Xbox users and confusion from pundits. There’s some console war tribalism in certain corners, but there are plenty of legitimate reasons to be concerned about this if you’re a current Xbox customer. It stands to reason that moving your exclusive games like Halo, Gears, or Forza to PlayStation eliminates a reason to buy an Xbox console. If you eliminate reasons to buy an Xbox console, you’re once again handing the keys to your future to other platforms, a problem Microsoft has right now with Google and Apple. Furthermore, you’re removing an endpoint to acquire users via Xbox Game Pass. Cloud is prohibitively expensive right now and is gatekept by Apple and Google, once again blocking in-app purchases or, in some cases, blocking it entirely. You’re also decreasing your footprint for game developers, who will increasingly see Xbox versions as wasting time. You set yourself up for a tailspin nosedive of exclusion, to the point where Xbox becomes another game publisher without a say in the overall direction of the industry — but maybe that’s the idea. The plan to move Xbox games to other platforms is codenamed “Latitude” internally, and I know there’s debate and unease at Microsoft about whether or not this is a good idea. More upcoming Microsoft-owned games slated for PlayStation are already being developed. At least for now, they’re potentially obvious games you’d most likely expect. And yes, while it’s true Microsoft is a prolific publisher on PlayStation already, it has typically revolved around specific franchises like Minecraft. From what I’ve heard, Microsoft is pushing for no “red line” for what games could come to PlayStation, and it all revolves around Satya Nadella and CFO Amy Hood’s mandate to increase every department’s margins. Obviously, putting Halo Infinite on PlayStation will increase profit margins. Sea of Thieves enjoyed the top spot on the PlayStation Store this past week. And in a perfect world, it’s great that more people get to play these games. But we don’t live in a perfect world where platform holders willingly collaborate for customers’ betterment while competing on pure value. Like many of Microsoft’s other recent strategies, pursuing this strategy is a short-term margin booster with long-term consequences. Yes, the industry is struggling, and Microsoft isn’t the only hardware manufacturer that has seen declines. But destroying the foundational reason to buy an Xbox isn’t the answer you give if you do care about the long-term. Microsoft needs to learn some patience Satya Nadella has criticized Xbox’s exclusive games strategy, quite vocally. (Image credit: Microsoft | Windows Central)Microsoft’s net income last quarter was over $20 billion. Plenty of that is attributable to cloud, and I’m not suggesting Azure has to prop up its other businesses, but there’s something to be said about playing the long term game. Microsoft co-founder and former CEO Bill Gates once offered a variation of a quote attributed to dozens of others, which follows something like this: “People often overestimate what will happen in the next two years and underestimate what will happen in ten.” Microsoft doesn’t seem to be learning from these lessons. There could be a wave of new mobile A.I. devices that Microsoft could’ve taken advantage of if it at least had some foothold in mobile phones. There could be some super hit viral game around the corner that would turn around Xbox’s console fortunes if Microsoft doesn’t kill its hardware platform with short-sighted decisions soon. A Microsoft competitor may emerge who takes customer service and security investments more seriously and works to undermine trust in Microsoft’s products through those weaknesses Microsoft has allowed to accumulate. Perhaps Zuckerberg’s multi-billion dollar gambit in the metaverse ends up paying off. Hindsight is 20/20, and I’m admittedly not privy to the full range of factors driving some of Microsoft’s decision-making. But after ten years, the results tend to speak for themselves. I always hear that Microsoft is “learning, learning, learning” from its mistakes, but it never seems to do so. They acquire companies at a breakneck speed, underinvest in integrations, and then shut down those divisions and products while wondering what went wrong. We’ve seen it repeatedly: reams of layoffs, underbaked integrations, low investment, and taking customers for granted. I used to wonder why many Microsoft reporters seemed jaded, but after almost a decade, I feel like I’m starting to understand. There’s still plenty to love here, and I’m certainly not denigrating the efforts of individuals in those teams — I want them to be supported better and for customers to be treated with more care. I like Windows 11 for the most part, and I like the possibility of using Surface with ARM. Xbox seems to have an impressive slate of upcoming games. But because of the patterns Microsoft keeps throwing at us, it all comes with a cloud of doubt. Doubt is easy — building trust is hard, and Microsoft hasn’t learned this yet.
Jez CordenSocial Links NavigationExecutive EditorJez Corden is the Executive Editor at Windows Central, focusing primarily on all things Xbox and gaming. Jez is known for breaking exclusive news and analysis as relates to the Microsoft ecosystem while being powered by tea. Follow on Twitter (X) and Threads, and listen to his XB2 Podcast, all about, you guessed it, Xbox!
CATEGORIES
Microsoft
See all comments (11)
11 Comments
Comment from the forums
TBBudak
Saying MS needs to learn patience is a bit outrageous. Any other company would’ve completely shut down Xbox.
Xbox has been struggling since the Xbox One, that’s a decade now. They’ve made some positive changes like creating the most powerful consoles (One X and Series X) and they’ve brought major studios.
Microsoft has done everything to increase the popularity of Xbox for over a decade now, and they’ve failed. They own so many studios that making their games Xbox exclusive would kill the IPs they own.
Starfield wasn’t even in the Top 10 best selling games of lasf year, which is outrageous for a Bethesda game. You also have GamePass that cannibalizes sales.
And one thing, Phil Spencer said he’s never going to look at an Xbox game and say that they’re not coming to PS.
Xbox going multiplatform is the only way to save Xbox. Microsoft is suffering the consequences for having a community that’s not buying games.
Reply
K Shan
Great article. It’s sad. And frustrating because the only way their recent actions make any sense is that they want to kill Xbox, or at least some there want to stop supporting the console, but they don’t say it. They fire their award-winning studio right before they are about to work on a new game, release games cutting the marketing budget, and give their exclusives to the competitor with nothing in return, all while saying nothing but pr spin that makes less and less sense. Yes, these actions make them money shortterm, but what’s the log term strategy? We know from sony’s emails that Sony uses the funds from Xbox games on Playstation to pay developers not to release on Xbox. But we don’t know that MS is going to reinvest any of what they earn into Xbox. I’ve gone through enough MS products to recognize the pattern of Not exclusive, Just first –> Not First, just best –> Not best, just supported –> Why are you still here?
I’m not selling my Xbox. I still play and enjoy it. But I’m not buying the next one or even downloading their Xbox Phone Store until they can answer honestly what the future of Xbox looks like. Explain why anyone should buy an Xbox. Why anyone should make a game for Xbox. And what are they investing into Xbox.
Reply
TheFerrango
Of course they can’t blatantly say they’ll drop it.
Instead they rely on the well known phrases and sayings typical of the Microsoft way, like “we’re committed to continued support”, “we’re focusing on where the customers are first”, “we’ll keep supporting it for the product’s lifetime”, “we’re consolidating to offer a better experience and faster response”, etcetera.
You never directly close a product, you enshittify it until most customers have left of their own volition and then you close the product, citing poor sales and low usage as the culprit.
Just like Zune and later Windows Phone. The Zune HD team was disbanded as soon as the product hit the shelves, and yet they “remained committed” doing nothing but minor tweaks to the software for years.
Windows Phone was equally disastrous, with earlier versions constantly being abandoned while customers were promised either an upgrade way or a stopgap solution.
The Surface Duo is the latest of the group I can think of, and luckily one of the consumer products I missed on.
But you know what they won’t be discontinuing soon? The Ad platform they baked into Windows.
Reply
ikjadoon
In 2015, surrounded by holograms for the HoloLens reveal, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella said, “We want to move from people needing Windows to choosing Windows, to loving Windows. That is our goal.”
So how is that going, Satya? According to StatCounter (as a rough estimate):
January 2015: Windows 88%, macOS 9%, 3% other
April 2024: Windows 74%, macOS 15%, 11% other
In 9+ years, on a relative basis, Windows has dropped by -16%, macOS gained by +67%, and others (ChromeOS, SteamOS, etc.) gained by +267%. If Satya’s words were a strategic shift in policy, whatever MS did has since Jan. 2015 been a colossal failure.
Reply
ikjadoon
It’s not one thing in Windows, but it’s a death by a thousand cuts. Nonsense ads across the entire OS: File Explorer, Settings, OOBE, Start Menu, Edge, etc.
If the Windows 11 Start Menu was an app, I would’ve uninstalled it years ago.
Microsoft doesn’t stop there: perpetually in-beta Preview updates foisted onto consumers, decades-old bugs still chugging along (spend five minutes in the Windows Microsoft Store), clueless consumer understanding (e.g., no automatic dark / light mode switcher, like every other major OS?), silly performance regressions, a still-disjointed UX where great features are b
▲ HyperX Cloud III 無線電競耳機。（圖／翻攝自 HyperX）
記者樓菀玲／台北報導
HyperX 宣布推出 HyperX Cloud III 無線電競耳機，主打提供極致舒適佩戴體驗、沉浸式音效，以及高達 120 小時的電持續航力，將提供玩家絕佳舒適自在的無線遊戲體驗。
承襲品牌一貫極致舒適配戴感，耳機全新設計的 53mm 傾斜式驅動單體除提供沉浸式音效外，透過 NGENUITY 啟用的DTS Headphone:X 則帶來更加真實的 3D 空間音效。無論用於沉浸遊戲世界、體驗無線娛樂，或是進行工作會議，這款耳機都是最佳首選。
承襲 Cloud 系列一貫優越舒適度、高音質和耐用度外，全新 Cloud III 無線耳機經由 HyperX 音效工程師精心調校，以提供最清晰準確的音效品質。傾斜式 53mm 驅動單體以更最佳的角度增強音效準確度，呈現更細節且精確的音效。Cloud III 新增了 DTS Headphone:X 空間音效技術，可將音訊擴展到虛擬 3D 空間，創造可完美體現沉浸式的遊戲和觀影環境。針對玩家最重視的電池續航力，Cloud III無線耳機提供高達 120 小時的超長續航力，使遊戲玩家可享受長時間不間斷的遊戲時光。
▲ 新款可提供 120 小時的電池續航力。（圖／翻攝自 HyperX）
Cloud III 無線耳機採用全金屬框架，搭配鋼製頭帶和鋁合金前叉設計，可大幅延長耳機使用壽命。耳機完美結合了堅固的結構和柔軟的高級人造皮革，帶來的極致舒適感。除了紓壓記憶泡綿耳墊和頭帶上的加強襯墊外，還具有舒適的貼合度，讓遊戲玩家可以完全沉浸在遊戲中。
Cloud III 無線耳機藉由快速 2.4GHz 無線傳輸，提供卓越的遊戲體驗，確保零延遲和可靠的音訊。10mm 可拆式麥克風內含 LED 靜音指示燈功能，相較於上一代產品，音訊清晰度有感升級；麥克風也具備內建式金屬網狀防噴罩，無需購買額外的防噴罩。使用者可透過耳罩控制鍵快速調整調整音量，也可直接使用耳機耳罩上的控制鍵將麥克風設為靜音，大幅提升使用便利性。Cloud III無線耳機提供多平台相容性，包括 PC、
拆封收購ps5、PS4 和 Nintendo Switch。遊戲玩家可藉由隨附的 USB-C 無線訊號接收器和 USB-A 轉接器，輕鬆地將耳機連接至慣用的平台。
拆封收購
拆封收購